For the June 1994 Edition of the Pocket Guide,
immediately dangerous to life or health concentrations (IDLHs) were
reviewed and, in many cases, were revised and made more protective. As a
consequence of the IDLH changes, many of the respirator recommendations
for these substances were also revised. The criteria utilized to determine
the adequacy of existing IDLH values were a combination of those used
during the Standards Completion Program and a newer methodology developed
by NIOSH. These "interim" criteria form a tiered approach with
acute human toxicity data being used preferentially, followed next by
acute animal inhalation toxicity data, and then finally by acute animal
oral toxicity data to determine an updated IDLH value. When relevant acute
toxicity data were insufficient or unavailable, the use of chronic
toxicity data or an analogy to a chemically similar substance was
considered. The criteria and information sources for both the original and
revised IDLH values are given in Documentation
for Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health Concentrations (IDLHs)
(NTIS Publication No. PB-94-195047). NIOSH is currently assessing the
various uses of IDLHs and whether the original criteria used to derive the
IDLH values are valid or if other information or criteria should be
utilized. Based on this assessment, NIOSH will develop a new strategy for
revising the IDLH values currently listed, as well as for developing new
IDLH values for the more than 300 substances listed in the Pocket Guide
without IDLHs.
The definition of IDLH that was derived during
the Standards Completion Program was based on the Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) definition stipulated in 30 CFR 11.3(t). The purpose
for establishing an IDLH value in the Standards Completion Program was to
ensure that a worker could escape without injury or irreversible health
effects from an IDLH exposure in the event of the failure of respiratory
protection equipment. The IDLH was considered a maximum concentration
above which only a highly reliable breathing apparatus providing maximum
worker protection was permitted. In determining IDLH values, the ability
of a worker to escape without loss of life or irreversible health effects
was considered along with severe eye or respiratory irritation and other
deleterious effects (e.g., disorientation or incoordination) that could
prevent escape. As a safety margin, the Standards Completion Program IDLH
values were based on the effects that might occur as a consequence of a
30-minute exposure. However, the 30-minute period was NOT meant to imply
that workers should stay in the work environment any longer than
necessary, in fact, EVERY EFFORT SHOULD BE MADE TO EXIT IMMEDIATELY!
The current NIOSH definition for an IDLH exposure
condition, as stipulated in the NIOSH
Respirator Decision Logic (DHHS [NIOSH] Publication No. 87-108,
NTIS Publication No. PB-91-151183), is a condition "that poses a
threat of exposure to airborne contaminants when that exposure is likely
to cause death or immediate or delayed permanent adverse health effects or
prevent escape from such an environment." The purpose of establishing
an IDLH exposure concentration is to "ensure that the worker can
escape from a given contaminated environment in the event of failure of
the respiratory protection equipment." The NIOSH
Respirator Decision Logic uses these IDLH values as one of several
respirator selection criteria. Under the NIOSH
Respirator Decision Logic, the most protective respirators (e.g.,
a self-contained breathing apparatus equipped with a full facepiece and
operated in a pressure-demand or other positive-pressure mode) would be
selected for firefighting, exposure to carcinogens, entry into
oxygen-deficient atmospheres, in emergency situations, during entry into
an atmosphere that contains a substance at a concentration greater than
2,000 times the NIOSH REL or OSHA PEL, and for entry into IDLH
atmospheres.
IDLH values are listed for over 380 substances.
The notation "Ca" appears in this column for all substances that
NIOSH considers to be potential occupational carcinogens. However, IDLH
values that were originally determined in the Standards Completion Program
or were recently revised are shown in brackets following the
"Ca" designations. "10%LEL" indicates that the IDLH
was based on 10% of the lower explosive limit for safety considerations
even though the relevant toxicological data indicated that irreversible
health effects or impairment of escape existed only at higher
concentrations. "N.D." indicates that an IDLH has not as yet
been determined.